[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14048097#comment-14048097
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11433:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12653191/HBase_11433_v1.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12653191
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:red}-1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 3
warning messages.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 13 new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
{color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}. There are 2 zombie test(s):
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestIOFencing.testFencingAroundCompactionAfterWALSync(TestIOFencing.java:218)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion.testWritesWhileGetting(TestHRegion.java:3499)
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9899//console
This message is automatically generated.
> LruBlockCache does not respect its configurable parameters
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11433
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.96.2, 0.99.0, 0.98.3
> Reporter: Shengzhe Yao
> Assignee: Shengzhe Yao
> Fix For: 0.99.0, 0.96.3, 0.98.4
>
> Attachments: HBase_11433_v1.patch, HBase_11433_v1.patch
>
>
> We've upgraded our production cluster from 0.94.15 to 0.96.2 few days ago and
> observed increased GC frequency and occasionally full GC (we never had full
> GC before with G1 GC), which leads to famous juliet pause...
> After digging into several HBase metrics, we've found that block cache used
> much higher memory in 0.96. It turns out due to patch: HBASE-6312, which not
> only make a few block cache parameter configurable, but also change their
> default values! It is obvious that we need to set these parameters back to
> the old value before considering reduce block cache size or tuning our GC.
> However, we are surprised that there is no change in regionserver side and we
> are still observing high block cache usage.
> At the end of the day, it seems in CacheConfig.java, we initialize
> LruBlockCache with default constructor: LruBlockCache(long maxSize, long
> blockSize), which underlying always use the default values. We think this is
> a bug and we should always use another constructor: LruBlockCache(long
> maxSize, long blockSize, boolean evictionThread, Configuration conf) in
> CacheConfig.java
> We made the change and tested on one of our servers, it works and now GC
> problem disappears. Of course, we have to review our hbase and GC
> configurations and find the best configuration under 0.96 for our
> application. But first, we feel the constructor misuse in CacheConfig.java
> should be fixed.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
