[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14049364#comment-14049364 ]
stack commented on HBASE-11118: ------------------------------- I published a SNAPSHOT for you [~fs111] up at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/ SNAPSHOT is named: 0.98.4-11118-SNAPSHOT Hopefully you get a chance to test. Thanks. > non environment variable solution for "IllegalAccessError: class > com.google.protobuf.ZeroCopyLiteralByteString cannot access its superclass > com.google.protobuf.LiteralByteString" > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-11118 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11118 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.98.2 > Reporter: André Kelpe > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.99.0 > > Attachments: 11118.bytestringer.txt, > 1118.suggested.undoing.optimization.on.clientside.txt, > 1118.suggested.undoing.optimization.on.clientside.txt, > HBASE-11118-0.98.patch.gz, HBASE-11118-trunk.patch.gz, shade_attempt.patch > > > I am running into the problem described in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10304, while trying to use a > newer version within cascading.hbase > (https://github.com/cascading/cascading.hbase). > One of the features of cascading.hbase is that you can use it from lingual > (http://www.cascading.org/projects/lingual/), our SQL layer for hadoop. > lingual has a notion of providers, which are fat jars that we pull down > dynamically at runtime. Those jars give users the ability to talk to any > system or format from SQL. They are added to the classpath programmatically > before we submit jobs to a hadoop cluster. > Since lingual does not know upfront , which providers are going to be used in > a given run, the HADOOP_CLASSPATH trick proposed in the JIRA above is really > clunky and breaks the ease of use we had before. No other provider requires > this right now. > It would be great to have a programmatical way to fix this, when using fat > jars. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)