[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14056646#comment-14056646
 ] 

deepankar commented on HBASE-11484:
-----------------------------------

Thanks for the suggestions.Yes, I know Restore is relatively cheap, but since 
Hive does not support (as far as I my knowledge goes) any cleanup hook , we 
have to cleanup all the restored Dirs, Rather we were thinking if we can 
restore once, after exporting the snapshot (ExportSnapshot job)  and then use 
that for all the further queries on this snapshot. 
[~mbertozzi] Thanks for the idea of the ClientSideRegionScanner, It a very good 
idea, but that class is not there in 0.94 and unfortunately we still use 0.94, 
and also I have to manage creating the splits (which TableSnapshotIF takes care 
of).
[~enis] For the sake of ensuring only I will write a function for verifying 
that for each reference in the snapshot, there is a HFileLink or HFile
present in the restoreDir

> Provide a way in TableSnapshotInputFormat, not to restore the regions to a 
> path for running MR every time, rather reuse a already restored path
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11484
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11484
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: mapreduce
>            Reporter: deepankar
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We are trying to back a Hive Table by the Map Reduce over snapshots  and we 
> don't want to restore the snapshot to a restoreDir every time we want to 
> execute a query. It would be nice if there is boolean in the function 
> * TableSnapshotInputFormat.setInput * and exposed outside in the
> * TableMapReduceUtil.initTableSnapshotMapperJob *, with this boolean
> it will check whether the snapshot and the restore dir are in sync, rather 
> than restoring again. 
> Is this Idea looks Ok to you guys or you have any other suggestions, I will 
> put up a patch for this if this idea is ok for guys



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to