[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14068601#comment-14068601
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-10560:
----------------------------------------
[~lhofhansl] mentioned this on user@:
{quote}
Subject: Re: Coprocessor beacuse of TTL expired?
[...]
HBASE-11054 is about delete trackers (i.e. when/how delete markers are
enforced), TTL is handled differently. One could ask why these are handled
differently of course.
{quote}
We could try moving TTL logic into the delete tracker. Would need to check how
the stacking works after HBASE-10885.
> Per cell TTLs
> -------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10560
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10560
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Fix For: 0.99.0, 0.98.5
>
>
> Now that we have cell tags, we can optionally store TTLs per cell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)