[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14068601#comment-14068601
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-10560:
----------------------------------------

[~lhofhansl] mentioned this on user@:
{quote}
Subject: Re: Coprocessor beacuse of TTL expired?
[...]
HBASE-11054 is about delete trackers (i.e. when/how delete markers are 
enforced), TTL is handled differently. One could ask why these are handled 
differently of course.
{quote}
We could try moving TTL logic into the delete tracker. Would need to check how 
the stacking works after HBASE-10885. 

> Per cell TTLs
> -------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10560
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10560
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.99.0, 0.98.5
>
>
> Now that we have cell tags, we can optionally store TTLs per cell. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to