[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14085797#comment-14085797
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11667:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12659813/IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithRegionMovement.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12659813
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.TestProcedureManager
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.TestIPC
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestClockSkewDetection
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Simplify ClientScanner logic for NSREs.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11667
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11667
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Fix For: 0.99.0, 2.0.0, 0.94.23, 0.98.6
>
> Attachments: 11667-0.94.txt, 11667-trunk.txt, HBASE-11667-0.98.patch,
> IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithRegionMovement.patch
>
>
> We ran into an issue with Phoenix where a RegionObserver coprocessor
> intercepts a scan and returns an aggregate (in this case a count) with a fake
> row key. It turns out this does not work when the {{ClientScanner}}
> encounters NSREs, as it uses the last key it saw to reset the scanner to try
> again (which in this case would be the fake key).
> While this is arguably a rare case and one could also argue that a region
> observer just shouldn't do this... While looking at {{ClientScanner}}'s code
> I found this logic not necessary.
> A NSRE occurred because we contacted a region server with a key that it no
> longer hosts. This is the start key, so it is always correct to retry with
> this same key. That simplifies the ClientScanner logic and also make this
> sort of coprocessors possible,
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)