[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103788#comment-14103788
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-11610:
-----------------------------------------
bq., this method seems to be more helpful if there is a batch of Puts.
It's more or less the same code that is used behind the scene when you do a
single put.
bq. I hope this works for you guys?
Strong +1 for not using the ThreadLocalHtable. Personally I would give a try to
the call to HConnection#processBatch stuff. It's it's better it justifies an
undeprecation imho (I'm not saying this just for this jira: I think it make
sense to have an interface different than HTable). But if you prefer another
approach, it's fine for me, it's your patch :-) (provided that there is no
thread local :-) )
> Enhance remote meta updates
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
> Assignee: Virag Kothari
> Attachments: HBASE-11610.patch
>
>
> Currently, if the meta region is on a regionserver instead of the master,
> meta update is synchronized on one HTable instance. We should be able to do
> better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
