[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14110958#comment-14110958
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11828:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12664420/HBASE-11828.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12664420

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+0 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to be a 
documentation patch that doesn't require tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10593//console

This message is automatically generated.

> callers of SeverName.valueOf should use equals and not ==
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11828
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11828
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>         Attachments: HBASE-11828.patch
>
>
> ServerName.valueOf is missing docs about the safety of using == vs .equals on 
> returned members.
> For clarity, we should specify that users are expected to use .equals even 
> though we may return shared immutable instances. The .equals method short 
> circuits on object equality, so the cost difference in the positive case is 1 
> function call.
> Current behavior is to return a new instance on each call (0.96, 0.98, 
> branch-1, master). So presumably any current users are either doing this or 
> they have a bug.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to