[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14136282#comment-14136282
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11993:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12669140/HBASE-11993-v0.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12669140
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:red}-1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 2
warning messages.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 1 new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithACL
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.TestCellACLWithMultipleVersions
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestTableSnapshotScanner
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestZooKeeper
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestEnforcingScanLabelGenerator
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestMasterOperationsForRegionReplicas
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReplicaWithCluster
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestRegionServerNoMaster
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.TestScannersWithLabels
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.handler.TestCreateTableHandler
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10921//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Expose the set of tables available in TableStateManager
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11993
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11993
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: master
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
> Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-11993-v0.patch
>
>
> TableStateManager has the full set of TableNames already in memory,
> we should expose the set of table names and use it instead of going to query
> the fs descriptors.
> (Is there any reason why we don't have the descriptors in-memory too? saving
> memory with tons of tables? do we even support tons of tables?)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
