[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14145015#comment-14145015
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12054:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12670739/HBASE-12054-0.98.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12670739
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 8 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11035//console
This message is automatically generated.
> bad state after NamespaceUpgrade with reserved table names
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12054
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12054
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.96.2, 0.99.0, 0.98.6.1
> Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
> Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
> Fix For: 1.0.0, 0.98.7
>
> Attachments: HBASE-12054-0.98.patch, HBASE-12054-branch1.patch,
> HBASE-12054-trunk.patch
>
>
> If 94 has a table called "data" NamespaceUpgrade will fail to bring that
> table up and the generated layout will be dirty with stuff like
> "/hbase/data/.data" and so on.
> (the reserved names that we have no longer apply in 96+ since the data is
> separate from the root dir)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
