[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14147805#comment-14147805
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12078:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12671106/HBASE-12078.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12671106

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 4 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-annotations.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11076//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Missing Data when scanning using PREFIX_TREE DATA-BLOCK-ENCODING
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12078
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.6.1
>         Environment: CentOS 6.3
> hadoop 2.5.0(hdfs)
> hadoop 2.2.0(hbase)
> hbase 0.98.6.1
> sun-jdk 1.7.0_67-b01
>            Reporter: zhangduo
>            Assignee: zhangduo
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.7, 0.99.1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-12078.patch, prefix_tree_error.patch
>
>
> our row key is combined with two ints, and we found that sometimes when we 
> using only the first int part to scan, the result returned may missing some 
> rows. But when we dump the whole hfile, the row is still there.
> We have written a testcase to reproduce the bug. It works like this:
> put 1-12345
> put 12345-0x01000000
> put 12345-0x01010000
> put 12345-0x02000000
> put 12345-0x02020000
> put 12345-0x03000000
> put 12345-0x03030000
> put 12345-0x04000000
> put 12345-0x04040000
> flush memstore
> then scan using 12345,the returned row key will be 
> 12345-0x20000000(12345-0x10000000 expected)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to