[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14152023#comment-14152023
]
Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-12040:
---------------------------------------------
{quote}
These tests are a bit small. 1M and one client. We should probably do larger
scale tests.
{quote}
I hear you there. I will add some more tests with increased load for the next
releases.
Ran tests again. Tests are average of 10 runs.
||Version||results||
|0.98 branch|0.5354156791|
|d6cc2fb|0.5298372735|
|c682d57|0.5359010151|
|b885130|0.5111323656|
|Branch-1|0.5437815828|
I will re-run 0.98.5 and 0.98.6 to correct my numbers...
> Performances issues with FilteredScanTest
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12040
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12040
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.99.1
> Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.98.7, 0.99.1
>
> Attachments: at-HBASE-11331.html, pre-HBASE-11331.html
>
>
> While testing 0.99.0RC1 release performances, compared to 0.98.6, figured
> that:
> - FilteredScanTest is 100 times slower;
> - RandomReadTest is 1.5 times slower;
> - RandomSeekScanTest is 3.2 times slower;
> - RandomScanWithRange10Test is 1,2 times slower;
> - RandomScanWithRange100Test is 1,3 times slower;
> - RandomScanWithRange1000Test is 4 times slower;
> - SequentialReadTest is 1,7 times slower;
> - SequentialWriteTest is just a bit faster;
> - RandomWriteTest is just a bit faster;
> - GaussianRandomReadBenchmark is just a beat slower;
> - SequentialReadBenchmark is 1,1 times slower;
> - SequentialWriteBenchmark is 1,1 times slower;
> - UniformRandomReadBenchmark crashed;
> - UniformRandomSmallScan is 1,3 times slower.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
