[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14156940#comment-14156940
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10153:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12672577/10153-v2-trunk.txt
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12672577
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestDistributedLogSplitting
{color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}. There are 2 zombie test(s):
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFilesSplitRecovery.testSplitWhileBulkLoadPhase(TestLoadIncrementalHFilesSplitRecovery.java:339)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFiles.testSimpleLoad(TestLoadIncrementalHFiles.java:100)
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-annotations.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11190//console
This message is automatically generated.
> improve VerifyReplication to compute BADROWS more accurately
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10153
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Operability, Replication
> Affects Versions: 0.94.14
> Reporter: cuijianwei
> Assignee: cuijianwei
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.7, 0.99.1
>
> Attachments: 10153-v2-trunk.txt, HBASE-10153-0.94-v1.patch,
> HBASE-10153-trunk.patch
>
>
> VerifyReplicaiton could compare the source table with its peer table and
> compute BADROWS. However, the current BADROWS computing method might not be
> accurate enough. For example, if source table contains rows as {r1, r2, r3,
> r4} and peer table contains rows as {r1, r3, r4} BADROWS will be 3 because
> 'r2' in source table will make all the later row comparisons fail. Will it be
> better if the BADROWS is computed to 1 in this situation? Maybe, we can
> compute the BADROWS more accurately in merge comparison?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
