[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13099813#comment-13099813
]
stack commented on HBASE-4329:
------------------------------
bq. Hence, my thinking was we could use YARN as an intermediate solution.
Why would it be only an intermediate soln Arun? What else needs to be done?
bq. If the HBase community decides to focus on the multi-tenancy/isolation
problem ... great! We can close this discussion. If not, I'd like to brainstorm
with you guys for an intermediate solution.
Well, we want to play nice with the neighbours.
I saw the show a few times -- at the hadoop summit -- but I haven't yet read
the book. Will be back when I learn more about YARN container.
> Use NextGen Hadoop to deploy HBase
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4329
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4329
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Reporter: Arun C Murthy
>
> Currently (circa 2011), with due respect, it's not practical to run shared,
> multi-tenant HBase clusters on the largest Hadoop installs (of 4000+ nodes).
> As an interim, I'd like to brainstorm using NextGen Hadoop (MAPREDUCE-279) to
> deploy HBase for focussed sets of applications/users/organizations. Thus, one
> could deploy a smaller instance of HBase (100s of nodes) in a large Hadoop
> cluster and use it for a set of applications.
> The other advantage is that the resource usage of HBase (master,
> region-server etc.) is accounted for in the overall utilization of the
> cluster and, conceivably, aid in resource tracking, capacity planning etc.
> ----
> Thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
