[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14180453#comment-14180453
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-12311:
---------------------------------------
[~apurtell], I agree. These are per HFile stats that we should keep them there.
This is markedly different from the type of stats that - for example - Phoenix
keeps around and from that angle is not wrong to have Phoenix keep these
metrics (and HBase's job is to provide the necessary plumbing to do that, as we
do with coprocessors)
In any case I can see this going both ways.
> Version stats in HFiles?
> ------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12311
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12311
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>
> In HBASE-9778 I basically punted the decision on whether doing repeated
> scanner.next() called instead of the issueing (re)seeks to the user.
> I think we can do better.
> One way do that is maintain simple stats of what the maximum number of
> versions we've seen for any row/col combination and store these in the
> HFile's metadata (just like the timerange, oldest Put, etc).
> Then we estimate fairly accurately whether we have to expect lots of versions
> (i.e. seek between columns is better) or not (in which case we'd issue
> repeated next()'s).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
