[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14213305#comment-14213305
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-12478:
--------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-0.98 #677 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/677/])
HBASE-12478 HBASE-10141 and MIN_VERSIONS are not compatible (tedyu: rev
835490e3b25c0d9923867461c173a123d06edd0c)
* hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestStore.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HStore.java
> HBASE-10141 and MIN_VERSIONS are not compatible
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12478
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12478
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Ted Yu
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.8, 0.99.2
>
> Attachments: 12478-0.98.patch, 12478-v1.txt, 12478-v2.txt
>
>
> HBASE-10141 is a good optimization, eliminating the need to scan already
> expired files (through TTL). However, I think if MIN_VERSIONS is set, it will
> not ensure that there will be at least that many versions since it bypasses
> the scan layer.
> I think we can just do a simple check before the HBASE-10141 optimization to
> see whether MIN_VERSIONS is set for the table, and if so just do the regular
> old way of doing the scan in the compaction.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
