[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14215458#comment-14215458
]
Rishit Shroff commented on HBASE-12259:
---------------------------------------
I have create a high-level set of features tasks(JIRA) to list the minimum
amount of work that needs to be done to integrate HydraBase changes in HBase
and bring Quorum based WAL to HBase. As and when people start working on these
JIRA, we will add more details about the changes and if required file sub-tasks
to make it easier to test/integrate.
> Bring quorum based write ahead log into HBase
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12259
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12259
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wal
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Attachments: Architecture for HydraBase (4).pdf
>
>
> HydraBase (
> https://code.facebook.com/posts/321111638043166/hydrabase-the-evolution-of-hbase-facebook/
> ) Facebook's implementation of HBase with Raft for consensus will be going
> open source shortly. We should pull in the parts of that fb-0.89 based
> implementation, and offer it as a feature in whatever next major release is
> next up. Right now the Hydrabase code base isn't ready to be released into
> the wild; it should be ready soon ( for some definition of soon).
> Since Hydrabase is based upon 0.89 most of the code is not directly
> applicable. So lots of work will probably need to be done in a feature branch
> before a merge vote.
> Is this something that's wanted?
> Is there anything clean up that needs to be done before the log
> implementation is able to be replaced like this?
> What's our story with upgrading to this? Are we ok with requiring down time ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
