[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Misty Stanley-Jones updated HBASE-9763:
---------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
           Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

Committed to master. Thanks [~gabriel.reid]

> Scan javadoc doesn't fully capture semantics of start and stop row
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9763
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Gabriel Reid
>            Assignee: Gabriel Reid
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-9763.patch
>
>
> The current javadoc for Scan#setStartRow and Scan#setStopRow methods don't 
> accurately capture the semantics of the use of row prefix values. Both 
> methods describe the use of a trailing null byte to change the 
> inclusive/exclusive the respective semantics of setStartRow and setStopRow.
> The use of a trailing null byte for start row exclusion only works in the 
> case that exact full matching is done on row keys. The use of a trailing null 
> byte for stop row inclusion has even more limitations (see HBASE-9035).
> The basic example is having the following rows:
> {code}
> AAB
> ABB
> BBC
> BCC
> {code}
> Setting the start row to A and the stop row to B will include AAB and AB. 
> Setting the start row to A\x0 and the stop row to B\x0 will result in the 
> same two rows coming out of the scan, instead of having an effect on the 
> inclusion/exclusion semantics.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to