[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14272998#comment-14272998
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-12836:
----------------------------------------
Can you explain to me how to run this scan for every RC? I'll add it to the
checklist doc. Good stuff.
As for HBASE-11446 I think we can live with it. I doubt we had any adopters of
that interface before the change.
> Tip of branch 0.98 has some binary incompatibilities with 0.98.0
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12836
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.98.10
> Reporter: Dima Spivak
>
> In working on HBASE-12808, I ran a scan between the 0.98.0 tag and the tip of
> branch 0.98 and found a handful of binary incompatibilities that are probably
> worth addressing:
> - org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.AccessControlClient.grant and
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.AccessControlClient.revoke had their
> return types and parameter lists changed in HBASE-12161. cc: [~srikanth235]
> and [~mbertozzi].
> - org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.CopyTable.createSubmittableJob is no
> longer static and its parameter list changed in HBASE-11997. cc:
> [~daviddengcn] and [~tedyu].
> - getBlockSize was added to the org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.crypto.Encryptor
> interface in HBASE-11446, which may lead to an AbstractMethodError exception
> in a 0.98.0 client that doesn't have this implemented. I suspect this one is
> worth living with? cc: [~apurtell].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
