[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14277797#comment-14277797
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-12848:
-------------------------------------

I thought of one minor issue with the current patch: it blindly passes the user 
param to the HDFS storage policy. On the plus side, this means hbase users 
could use additional modes as they become available. On the downside, we have 
two constants that don't actually get used and we provide less information for 
small misconfigurations than we could otherwise.

I'm still +1 because this is a good start. But maybe something to be considered 
in the parent issue as a general issue with how we interact with the HDFS 
feature?

> Utilize Flash storage for WAL
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12848
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12848
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 12848-v1.patch, 12848-v2.patch, 12848-v3.patch
>
>
> One way to improve data ingestion rate is to make use of Flash storage.
> HDFS is doing the heavy lifting - see HDFS-7228.
> We assume an environment where:
> 1. Some servers have a mix of flash, e.g. 2 flash drives and 4 traditional 
> drives.
> 2. Some servers have all traditional storage.
> 3. RegionServers are deployed on both profiles within one HBase cluster.
> This JIRA allows WAL to be managed on flash in a mixed-profile environment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to