[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107554#comment-13107554
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1935:
---------------------------------------
bq. Actually I do not even see a strong reason why client scanners need to
"live" inside HTable.
+1 Perhaps we can deprecate those methods and move scanners out to their own
package and/or class.
> Scan in parallel
> ----------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1935
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: coprocessors
> Reporter: stack
> Attachments: 1935-idea.txt, pscanner-v2.patch, pscanner-v3.patch,
> pscanner-v4.patch, pscanner.patch
>
>
> A scanner that rather than scan in series, instead scanned multiple regions
> in parallell would be more involved but could complete much faster
> partiularly if results are sparse.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
