[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14294107#comment-14294107
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12932:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12694830/HBASE-12932-0.98.patch
  against master branch at commit f7df0990c2d321cffd7ea2e20cb7b280d8cc9db6.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12694830

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/12607//console

This message is automatically generated.

> [0.98] Change the interface annotation of HConnection from Public/Stable to 
> Public/Evolving
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12932
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12932
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.98.10
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-12932-0.98.patch
>
>
> See the tail of HBASE-12859. Lars wants to add methods to HConnection. I 
> suggest not because HConnection has Public/Stable annotation. Enis then says:
> {quote}
> We do not differentiate or explicitly document this, but my understanding of 
> most of our InterfaceAudience.Public is for consumption, not for extending or 
> implementing interfaces (except for some coprocessor cases). So I think we 
> should be free to add new methods in Admin, Connection, etc in minor 
> versions. I would say that in patch versions we should not do such changes.
> Maybe we can do a base classes as a convenience, but still with no guarantees.
> {quote}
> to which I reply:
> {quote}
> Shrug. So the Public/Stable annotation just means "keep this interface 
> around, don't worry about changes that will break an implementor?" . Then 
> what would Public/Evolving (or Unstable) mean as difference? Do we have what 
> the annotations mean documented somewhere? This point didn't come up in a 
> review when I backported client pushback, so now we have 
> StatisticsHConnection. If it's ok to add methods to HConnection I would like 
> to sink the 0.98.10 RC that has this change and fix it with a new patch/issue.
> {quote}
> I'm not sure what others think, but if we change the annotation of 
> HConnection to Public/Evolving then it would make sense to allow methods to 
> be added. 
> I will open a subtask of this issue to nuke StatisticsHConnection if/once the 
> annotation is changed. I would also sink the current 0.98.10 RC that has 
> StatisticsHConnection in it so it never sees the light of day.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to