[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14317619#comment-14317619
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-12070:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #731 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/731/])
HBASE-12070 Add an option to hbck to fix ZK inconsistencies (Stephen Yuan 
Jiang) (enis: rev a8632593b62614d5c2aa3649e72b7b4e4c6141c8)
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java
* hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/ZKTableStateManager.java
* 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/HbckTestingUtil.java
* 
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/ZKTableStateClientSideReader.java


> Add an option to hbck to fix ZK inconsistencies
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12070
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12070
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hbck
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Sudarshan Kadambi
>            Assignee: Stephen Yuan Jiang
>             Fix For: 1.0.1, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-12070.v1-branch-1.patch, 
> HBASE-12070.v2-branch-1.patch
>
>
> If the HMaster bounces in the middle of table creation, we could be left in a 
> state where a znode exists for the table, but that hasn't percolated into 
> META or to HDFS. We've run into this a couple times on our clusters. Once the 
> table is in this state, the only fix is to rm the znode using the 
> zookeeper-client. Doing this manually looks a bit error prone. Could an 
> option be added to hbck to catch and fix such inconsistencies?
> A more general issue I'd like comment on is whether it makes sense for 
> HMaster to be maintaining its own write-ahead log? The idea would be that on 
> a bounce, the master would discover it was in the middle of creating a table 
> and either rollback or complete that operation? An issue that we observed 
> recently was that a table that was in DISABLING state before a bounce was not 
> in that state after. A write-ahead log to persist table state changes seems 
> useful. Now, all of this state could be in ZK instead of the WAL - it doesn't 
> matter where it gets persisted as long as it does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to