[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113625#comment-13113625
]
Roman Shaposhnik commented on HBASE-4427:
-----------------------------------------
@ Jean-Daniel Cryans
I'm sorry to drag it longer than it should be -- but you didn't answer my
question. Your concerned is answered in the comment #4 (look for
embeddedClientPort or miniZKclientPort). Of course all of this is totally
predicated on all the clients always paying attention to hbase-default.xml.
Whether they always do or not, was, in fact, my question ;-)
P.S. Sorry for not mentioning embeddedClientPort or miniZKclientPort in the
description of the proposed change, I thought it would be assumed, but I should
have been more explicit.
> It would help to run a standalone HBase's ZK on a different port
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4427
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4427
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: zookeeper
> Affects Versions: 0.90.4
> Reporter: Roman Shaposhnik
> Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
> Priority: Minor
>
> It would be extremely helpful to have standalone HBase default to a
> non-standard port for running its embedded ZK. This would help to run HBase
> on the same host where a legitimate fully distributed ZK server, etc.
> It seems that the following addition to hbase-default.xml would be enough to
> make it happen:
> {noformat}
> + <property>
> + <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.clientPort</name>
> + <value>4181</value>
> + </property>
> {noformat}
> This will take care of the master/client for HBase and can be overridden in
> hbase-site if needed.
> Thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
