[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326330#comment-14326330
]
stack commented on HBASE-12706:
-------------------------------
Upped priority. I think this a critical need now we have so many folks
deploying many RS per instance. One question [~syuanjiang], does this work if i
have server1 on port X and server1 on port Y? I don't see why not but there is
no test for it.
> Support multiple port numbers in ZK quorum string
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12706
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0
> Reporter: Stephen Yuan Jiang
> Assignee: Stephen Yuan Jiang
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-12706.v1-master.patch
>
>
> HBase does not allow the zk quorum string to contain port numbers in this
> format:
> {noformat}
> hostname1:port1,hostname2:port2,hostname3:port3
> {noformat}
> Instead it expects the string to be in this format:
> {noformat}
> hostname1,hostname2,hostname3:port3
> {noformat}
> And port 3 is used for all the client ports. We should flex the parsing so
> that both forms are accepted.
> A sample exception:
> {code}
> java.io.IOException: Cluster key passed
> host1:2181,host2:2181,host3:2181,host4:2181,host5:2181:2181:/hbase is
> invalid, the format should
> be:hbase.zookeeper.quorum:hbase.zookeeper.client.port:zookeeper.znode.parent
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZKUtil.transformClusterKey(ZKUtil.java:403)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZKUtil.applyClusterKeyToConf(ZKUtil.java:386)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.ReplicationPeersZKImpl.getPeerConf(ReplicationPeersZKImpl.java:304)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.ReplicationPeersZKImpl.createPeer(ReplicationPeersZKImpl.java:435)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
