[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14344510#comment-14344510
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-13109:
---------------------------------------
Some more test with many HFiles (4m rows, 5 cols, 1 version - as above). No
compactions at all -> 25 HFiles of 10mb each.
Without patch:
||Wildcard||Col 2+4||
|4.59|13.5|
With patch:
||Wildcard||Col 2+4||
|4.38|4.89|
Almost a 3x improvement. I have convinced myself that this is good.
Somebody up for independent tests? I have a 0.98 patch as well (in fact that's
the one I have used for testing)?
> Make better SEEK vs SKIP decisions during scanning
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13109
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13109
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 13109-trunk-v2.txt, 13109-trunk-v3.txt,
> 13109-trunk-v4.txt, 13109-trunk.txt
>
>
> I'm re-purposing this issue to add a heuristic as to when to SEEK and when to
> SKIP Cells. This has come up in various issues, and I think I have a way to
> finally fix this now. HBASE-9778, HBASE-12311, and friends are related.
> --- Old description ---
> This is a continuation of HBASE-9778.
> We've seen a scenario of a very slow scan over a region using a timerange
> that happens to fall after the ts of any Cell in the region.
> Turns out we spend a lot of time seeking.
> Tested with a 5 column table, and the scan is 5x faster when the timerange
> falls before all Cells' ts.
> We can use the lookahead hint introduced in HBASE-9778 to do opportunistic
> SKIPing before we actually seek.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
