[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14347436#comment-14347436
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12562:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12702261/hbase-12562_v1.patch
  against master branch at commit 883d6fd8e512b14c967d2f7acf78d2b1d40e40fe.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12702261

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13083//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Handling memory pressure for secondary region replicas
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12562
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12562
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-12562_v1.patch
>
>
> This issue will track the implementation of how to handle the memory pressure 
> for secondary region replicas. Since the replicas cannot flush by themselves, 
> the region server might get blocked or cause extensive flushing for its 
> primary regions. The design doc attached at HBASE-11183 contains two possible 
> solutions that we can pursue. The first one is to not allow secondary region 
> replicas to not flush by themselves, but instead of needed allow them to 
> refresh their store files on demand (which possibly allows them to drop their 
> memstore snapshots or memstores). The second approach is to allow the 
> secondaries to flush to a temporary space. 
> Both have pros and cons, but for simplicity and to not cause extra write 
> amplification, we have implemented the first approach. More details can be 
> found in the design doc, but we can also discuss other options here. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to