[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14352541#comment-14352541
]
stack commented on HBASE-12990:
-------------------------------
[~octo47] site failing is not you; it started recently. Let me see if can do
something about it. Your v8 patch looks good apart from this. Good for master
I'd say. You want to do one for branch-1? If so, you might want to have
hadoopqa run the patch first. You can do this by adding '.branch-1' to the
patch name: HBASE-12990.v8.branch-1.patch
> MetaScanner should be replaced by MetaTableAccessor
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12990
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12990
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Andrey Stepachev
> Assignee: Andrey Stepachev
> Attachments: HBASE-12990.patch, HBASE-12990.v2.patch,
> HBASE-12990.v3.patch, HBASE-12990.v4.patch, HBASE-12990.v5.patch,
> HBASE-12990.v5.patch, HBASE-12990.v5.patch, HBASE-12990.v6.patch,
> HBASE-12990.v7.patch, HBASE-12990.v7.patch, HBASE-12990.v7.patch,
> HBASE-12990.v8.patch
>
>
> MetaScanner and MetaTableAccessor do similar things, but seems they tend to
> diverge. Let's have only one thing to enquiry META.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
