[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14368715#comment-14368715
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-13235:
--------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.1 #302 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1/302/])
HBASE-13235 Revisit the security auditing semantics (Srikanth Srungarapu)
(matteo.bertozzi: rev 6b411b5d00e114946aeee1c6fa6f0d60fe04087a)
*
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/access/AccessController.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TableName.java
*
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/access/AuthResult.java
> Revisit the security auditing semantics.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13235
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13235
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Srikanth Srungarapu
> Assignee: Srikanth Srungarapu
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-13235.patch, HBASE-13235_v2.patch,
> HBASE-13235_v2.patch, HBASE-13235_v3.patch, HBASE-13235_v4.patch
>
>
> More specifically, the following things need a closer look. (Will include
> more based on feedback and/or suggestions)
> * Table name (say test) instead of fully qualified table name(default:test)
> being used.
> * Right now, we're using the scope to be similar to arguments for operation.
> Would be better to decouple the arguments for operation and scope involved in
> checking. For e.g. say for createTable, we have the following audit log
> {code}
> Access denied for user esteban; reason: Insufficient permissions; remote
> address: /10.20.30.1; request: createTable; context: (user=srikanth@XXX,
> scope=default, action=CREATE)
> {code}
> The scope was rightly being used as default namespace, but we're missing out
> the information like operation params for CREATE which we used to log prior
> to HBASE-12511.
> Would love to hear inputs on this!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
