[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14382820#comment-14382820
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-13291 at 3/26/15 10:29 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
bq. the way to optimize this is keep an index to cells in the blockcache
I started something like this here: HBASE-11811. Has a bunch of other
advantages too.
(I'm not using the index there to avoid readKeyValueLen, but it could be used
for that)
was (Author: lhofhansl):
bq. the way to optimize this is keep an index to cells in the blockcache
I started something like this here: HBASE-11811. Has a bunch of other
advantages too.
> Lift the scan ceiling
> ---------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13291
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Scanners
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Attachments: 13291.inlining.txt, Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.12.13
> PM.png, hack_to_bypass_bb.txt, q (1).png, traces.7.svg, traces.filterall.svg,
> traces.nofilter.svg, traces.small2.svg, traces.smaller.svg
>
>
> Scanning medium sized rows with multiple concurrent scanners exhibits
> interesting 'ceiling' properties. A server runs at about 6.7k ops a second
> using 450% of possible 1600% of CPUs when 4 clients each with 10 threads
> doing scan 1000 rows. If I add '--filterAll' argument (do not return
> results), then we run at 1450% of possible 1600% possible but we do 8k ops a
> second.
> Let me attach flame graphs for two cases. Unfortunately, there is some
> frustrating dark art going on. Let me try figure it... Filing issue in
> meantime to keep score in.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
