[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14385094#comment-14385094
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-13291:
------------------------------------------------
I would say it is because of the Explicit Column Trackers. See Sca
{code}
Scan scan = new Scan(startAndStopRow.getFirst(),
startAndStopRow.getSecond());
if (opts.filterAll) {
scan.setFilter(new FilterAllFilter());
}
scan.addColumn(FAMILY_NAME, QUALIFIER_NAME);
{code}
This would do a seek every time.
> Lift the scan ceiling
> ---------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13291
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Scanners
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Attachments: 13291.inlining.txt, Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.12.13
> PM.png, Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 3.39.33 PM.png, hack_to_bypass_bb.txt,
> nonBBposAndInineMvccVint.txt, q (1).png, traces.7.svg, traces.filterall.svg,
> traces.nofilter.svg, traces.small2.svg, traces.smaller.svg
>
>
> Scanning medium sized rows with multiple concurrent scanners exhibits
> interesting 'ceiling' properties. A server runs at about 6.7k ops a second
> using 450% of possible 1600% of CPUs when 4 clients each with 10 threads
> doing scan 1000 rows. If I add '--filterAll' argument (do not return
> results), then we run at 1450% of possible 1600% possible but we do 8k ops a
> second.
> Let me attach flame graphs for two cases. Unfortunately, there is some
> frustrating dark art going on. Let me try figure it... Filing issue in
> meantime to keep score in.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
