[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14391488#comment-14391488
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13378:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12708755/HBASE-13378.txt
  against master branch at commit 485800830a58da1af31beaac859d99b56d823f99.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12708755

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.1 2.5.2 2.6.0)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 4 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:red}-1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch generated 1 release 
audit warnings (more than the master's current 0 warnings).

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

     {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are 1 zombie test(s):       
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionServerObserver.testCoprocessorHooksInRegionsMerge(TestRegionServerObserver.java:100)

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13524//testReport/
Release audit warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13524//artifact/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditWarnings.txt
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13524//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13524//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Javadoc warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13524//artifact/patchprocess/patchJavadocWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13524//console

This message is automatically generated.

> RegionScannerImpl synchronized for READ_UNCOMMITTED Isolation Levels
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13378
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13378
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: John Leach
>            Assignee: John Leach
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-13378.txt
>
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>          Time Spent: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This block of code below coupled with the close method could be changed so 
> that READ_UNCOMMITTED does not synchronize.  
> {CODE:JAVA}
>       // synchronize on scannerReadPoints so that nobody calculates
>       // getSmallestReadPoint, before scannerReadPoints is updated.
>       IsolationLevel isolationLevel = scan.getIsolationLevel();
>       synchronized(scannerReadPoints) {
>         this.readPt = getReadpoint(isolationLevel);
>         scannerReadPoints.put(this, this.readPt);
>       }
> {CODE}
> This hotspots for me under heavy get requests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to