[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tobi Vollebregt updated HBASE-13430:
------------------------------------
    Attachment: hbase-13430-test.patch

Patch that adds a failing unit test that reproduces the issue. 

> HFiles that are in use by a table cloned from a snapshot may be deleted when 
> that snapshot is deleted
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13430
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13430
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hbase
>            Reporter: Tobi Vollebregt
>              Labels: data-integrity, master
>         Attachments: hbase-13430-test.patch
>
>
> We recently had a production issue in which HFiles that were still in use by 
> a table were deleted. This appears to have been caused by race conditions in 
> the order in which HFileLinks are created, combined with the fact that only 
> files younger than {{hbase.master.hfilecleaner.ttl}} are kept alive.
> This is how to reproduce:
>  * Clone a large snapshot into a new table. The clone operation must take 
> more than {{hbase.master.hfilecleaner.ttl}} time to guarantee data loss.
>  * Ensure that no other table or snapshot is referencing the HFiles used by 
> the new table.
>  * Delete the snapshot. This breaks the table.
> The main cause is this:
>  * Cloning a snapshot creates the table in the {{HBASE_TEMP_DIRECTORY}}.
>  * However, it immediately creates back references to the HFileLinks that it 
> creates for the table in the archive directory.
>  * HFileLinkCleaner does not check the {{HBASE_TEMP_DIRECTORY}}, so it 
> considers all those back references deletable.
>  * The only thing that keeps them alive is the TimeToLiveHFileCleaner, but 
> only for 5 minutes.
>  * So if cloning the snapshot takes more than 5 minutes, and the HFiles 
> aren't referenced by anything else, data loss is guaranteed.
> I have a unit test reproducing the issue and I tried to fix this, but didn't 
> completely succeed. I will attach the patch shortly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to