[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14493712#comment-14493712
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-11425:
-------------------------------

Took another read of the doc (and above comments on it).

#  (Continuing from comments above), suggest adding to the doc estimation of 
how many extra objects will be made going this route and  Vladimir's grid to 
show what you are focused on. 
# Did you fellas have a look at how others do offheaping or if there were libs 
you could have made use of? Would have been good to include notes on your 
findings in here.
# The section on hasArray (if hasArray is false, it seems to imply 
hasByteBuffer is true) and the discussion of added APIs and when they come into 
effect and when they throw unsupported exceptions will need a rewrite in light 
of feedback above and review of recent patches (API method names I think we've 
cleaned up too).
# Sounds like you fellas looked at netty ByteBuf too. Add in your findings I'd 
say.
# Would have liked to have more detail around the RPC findings. You think it 
could be different now we have buffer reuse? We could save making a cellblock?
# Looking at diagrams for perf, I can't tell if more is better or not. Suggest 
you write up a summary of what the diagrams are showing.
# This feature when on, will be for whole server, right? Can't do by table or 
region, right?

Thanks lads.






> Cell/DBB end-to-end on the read-path
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11425
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11425
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Umbrella
>          Components: regionserver, Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 0.99.0
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>         Attachments: HBASE-11425-E2E-NotComplete.patch, HBASE-11425.patch, 
> Offheap reads in HBase using BBs_V2.pdf, Offheap reads in HBase using 
> BBs_final.pdf
>
>
> Umbrella jira to make sure we can have blocks cached in offheap backed cache. 
> In the entire read path, we can refer to this offheap buffer and avoid onheap 
> copying.
> The high level items I can identify as of now are
> 1. Avoid the array() call on BB in read path.. (This is there in many 
> classes. We can handle class by class)
> 2. Support Buffer based getter APIs in cell.  In read path we will create a 
> new Cell with backed by BB. Will need in CellComparator, Filter (like SCVF), 
> CPs etc.
> 3. Avoid KeyValue.ensureKeyValue() calls in read path - This make byte copy.
> 4. Remove all CP hooks (which are already deprecated) which deal with KVs.  
> (In read path)
> Will add subtasks under this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to