[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14503321#comment-14503321
]
stack commented on HBASE-13320:
-------------------------------
Duh. Thanks.
Patch is big improvement over what was there (Looks like we explain it in the
book but failed to do it in hbase-default).
So, you fellows suggesting that rather than supply a '0' as the patch does,
just supply nothing? Or you saying remove this config? If remove it, why not
remove all to do w/ bucketcache since all but one value are unset
(hbase.bucketcache.sizes description should list default values too?)
> 'hbase.bucketcache.size' configuration value is not correct in
> hbase-default.xml
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13320
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13320
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hbase
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Y. SREENIVASULU REDDY
> Assignee: Y. SREENIVASULU REDDY
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-13320.patch, HBASE-v2-13320.patch
>
>
> In hbase-default.xml file
> * 'hbase.bucketcache.size' is not correct
> We either specify it as a float or in MB's and the default value that is
> mentioned is never used
> {code}
> <property>
> <name>hbase.bucketcache.size</name>
> <value>65536</value>
> <source>hbase-default.xml</source>
> </property>
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
