[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14505466#comment-14505466 ]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-13387: ---------------------------------------- I got ur point abt this bq. I have reservations about an Interface per server-side feature ByteBufferedCell will be bad name in such a case. ServerCell would have been better. We can change as per our discussion decision. Oh I am not good at all in naming. > Add ByteBufferedCell an extension to Cell > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13387 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: regionserver, Scanners > Reporter: Anoop Sam John > Assignee: Anoop Sam John > Attachments: ByteBufferedCell.docx, WIP_HBASE-13387_V2.patch, > WIP_ServerCell.patch > > > This came in btw the discussion abt the parent Jira and recently Stack added > as a comment on the E2E patch on the parent Jira. > The idea is to add a new Interface 'ByteBufferedCell' in which we can add > new buffer based getter APIs and getters for position in components in BB. > We will keep this interface @InterfaceAudience.Private. When the Cell is > backed by a DBB, we can create an Object implementing this new interface. > The Comparators has to be aware abt this new Cell extension and has to use > the BB based APIs rather than getXXXArray(). Also give util APIs in CellUtil > to abstract the checks for new Cell type. (Like matchingXXX APIs, > getValueAs<type> APIs etc) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)