[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14510455#comment-14510455
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13530:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12727805/HBASE-13530-master.patch
  against master branch at commit 031dd3638cff1310d85ce8ba62d2278f5ef1a904.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12727805

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.1 2.5.2 2.6.0)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.TestHeapSize

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13792//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13792//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13792//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13792//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Add param for bulkload wait duration in HRegion.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13530
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13530
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.12
>            Reporter: Victor Xu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.98.13
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13530-0.98.patch, HBASE-13530-master.patch, 
> HBASE-13530-v1.patch
>
>
> In our scenario, incremental read/write operations and complete bulkload 
> operations are mixed together. Bulkload needs write lock while read/write and 
> flush/compact need read lock. When a region is compacting, the bulkload could 
> hang at writeLock.tryLock(waitDuration, TimeUnit) method. The original 
> default waitDuration is 60sec (from 'hbase.busy.wait.duration'), and this 
> could block all read/writes operations from acquiring read lock for 1 minute. 
> The chances of this scenario become high when compaction speed limit 
> feature(HBASE-8329) is used.
> Maybe we need to decrease the wait duration ONLY for bulkload, and let 
> read/write keep theirs. So I add this param('hbase.bulkload.wait.duration') 
> to tune wait duration for bulkloading. Of course, it is a table level 
> setting, and the default value is from original logic.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to