[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14511483#comment-14511483
]
Matteo Bertozzi commented on HBASE-13551:
-----------------------------------------
{quote}Maybe do a LimitedPrivate(Procedure) as a way to differentiate procedure
clients? Or should we do it once Phoenix or some other framework wants to use
it.{quote}
I'm fine with both. +1 on the patch if you want to do it later when someone
will need it.
> Procedure V2 - Procedure classes should not be InterfaceAudience.Public
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13551
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: master
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-13551_v1.patch
>
>
> Just noticed this. We have ProcedureStore, and exceptions and some procedures
> declared as {{InterfaceAudience.Public}}. We should really make them Private
> or LimiterPrivate since Public is for user comsumption. Are we exposing
> Procedures to coprocessors? I do not see a use case for that, so it should be
> Private IMO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
