[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14522419#comment-14522419
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-12938:
----------------------------------------
Hmm..
I say the above and then go check Phoenix's POM.
{noformat}
<dependency>
<groupId>org.cloudera.htrace</groupId>
<artifactId>htrace-core</artifactId>
<version>${htrace.version}</version>
</dependency>
{noformat}
Sigh. I'm just going to close this as later. We can move up the 0.98 HTrace
version when/if Phoenix needs us to but whatever.
> Upgrade HTrace to a recent supportable incubating version
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12938
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12938
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>
> In 0.98 we have an old htrace (still using the org.cloudera.htrace package)
> and since the introduction of htrace code, htrace itself first moved to
> org.htrace, then became an incubating project. I filed this as a bug because
> the HTrace version we reference in 0.98 is of little to no use going forward.
> Unfortunately we must make a disruptive change, although it looks to be
> mostly fixing up imports, we expose no HTrace classes to HBase configuration,
> and where we extend HTrace classes in our code, those HBase classes are in
> hbase-server and not tagged for public consumption.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
