[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14528898#comment-14528898
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-13579:
----------------------------------------
Hey [~ram_krish], let's wait to hear back from [~stack]. In the meantime if
you're planning to put up an 0.98 patch, let's do that. Or if not, don't worry,
I can port back the branch-1 patch later.
> Avoid isCellTTLExpired() for NO-TAG cases
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13579
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13579
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Scanners
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Attachments: HBASE-13579_1.patch, HBASE-13579_2.patch,
> HBASE-13579_KVExtension.patch, HBASE-13579_branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-13579_storelevel.patch
>
>
> As observed in this JIRA's performance test, we are always calling the
> isCellTTLExpired() for every cell and internally it is parsing the keyLength,
> valueLength() to get the tagsLength after which we decide whether Cell level
> TTL is present are not.
> This JIRA aims to avoid this check if all the readers of the storescanner
> knows that there are no tags to read. Note that, for the memstore scanner we
> will do that in another JIRA, which I suppose Stack had already raised to
> avoid tag length while flushing (for the NO-TAG) case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
