[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14530183#comment-14530183
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-13579:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #903 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/903/])
HBASE-13579 - Avoid isCellTTLExpired() for NO-TAG cases (Ram) (ramkrishna: rev 
76558b2b55015e3b75259cc0e8b0530a4c590771)
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/NoTagsKeyValue.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFileReaderV3.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFileReaderV2.java


> Avoid isCellTTLExpired() for NO-TAG cases
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13579
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13579
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.0.1
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0, 0.98.14, 1.0.2, 1.2.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13579_0.98.patch, HBASE-13579_0.98_1.patch, 
> HBASE-13579_1.patch, HBASE-13579_2.patch, HBASE-13579_KVExtension.patch, 
> HBASE-13579_branch-1.patch, HBASE-13579_branch-1_1.patch, 
> HBASE-13579_storelevel.patch
>
>
> As observed in this JIRA's performance test, we are always calling the 
> isCellTTLExpired() for every cell and internally it is parsing the keyLength, 
> valueLength() to get the tagsLength after which we decide whether Cell level 
> TTL is present are not.
> This JIRA aims to avoid this check if all the readers of the storescanner 
> knows that there are no tags to read.  Note that, for the memstore scanner we 
> will do that in another JIRA, which I suppose Stack had already raised to 
> avoid tag length while flushing (for the NO-TAG) case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to