[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Francke updated HBASE-13645:
---------------------------------
Description:
This being an interface makes it a bit harder on implementors. It'd be easier
with Java8 and default implementations.
We could either
# add new *columnFamily methods and deprecate the old ones or
# rename the existing ones without doing a deprecation first.
Implementors would need to change their code in each of those cases. But
because we have the {{BaseMasterObserver}} and {{BaseMasterAndRegionObserver}}
it'd make things easier for people using those classes if we go with option 1.
So that's my preference.
The plan would be to add these methods in 2.0.0 and remove the old ones in
3.0.0.
was:
This being an interface makes it a bit harder on implementors. It'd be easier
with Java8 and default implementations.
We could either
# add new *columnFamily methods and deprecate the old ones or
# rename the existing ones without doing a deprecation first.
Implementors would need to change their code in each of those cases. But
because we have the {{BaseMasterObserver}} and {{BaseMasterAndRegionObserver}}
it'd make things easier for people using those classes if we go with option 1.
So that's my preference.
> Rename *column methods in MasterObserver to *columnFamily
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13645
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13645
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Lars Francke
> Assignee: Lars Francke
> Priority: Minor
>
> This being an interface makes it a bit harder on implementors. It'd be easier
> with Java8 and default implementations.
> We could either
> # add new *columnFamily methods and deprecate the old ones or
> # rename the existing ones without doing a deprecation first.
> Implementors would need to change their code in each of those cases. But
> because we have the {{BaseMasterObserver}} and
> {{BaseMasterAndRegionObserver}} it'd make things easier for people using
> those classes if we go with option 1. So that's my preference.
> The plan would be to add these methods in 2.0.0 and remove the old ones in
> 3.0.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
