[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-13510:
-------------------------------------------
    Attachment: HBASE-13510_3.patch

Renamed BytebloomFilter to BloomFilterChunk so that we no longer have a type of 
BloomFilter called ByteBloomFilter. Also it makes sense because now the 
BloomFilterChunk is the building block for CompoundBloomFilter.
Move the createBloomKeyValue() to the local area ie. StoreFile.java.
Rest of the patch is similar to what was done previously.

> Refactor Bloom filters to make use of Cell Comparators in case of ROW_COL
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13510
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13510_1.patch, HBASE-13510_2.patch, 
> HBASE-13510_3.patch
>
>
> In order to address the comments over in HBASE-10800 related to comparing 
> Cell with a serialized KV's key we had some need for that in Bloom filters.  
> After discussing with Anoop, we found that it may be possible to 
> remove/modify some of the APIs in the BloomFilter interfaces and for doing 
> that we can purge ByteBloomFilter.  
> I read the code and found that ByteBloomFilter was getting used in V1 version 
> only.  Now as it is obsolete we can remove this code and move some of the 
> static APIs in ByteBloomFilter to some other util class or bloom related 
> classes which will help us in refactoring the code too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to