[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14549749#comment-14549749
 ] 

Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-13709:
---------------------------------------

The other option that I've always thought would solve some of the races in meta 
is to always do a check and put.

> Updates to meta table server columns may be eclipsed
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13709
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13709
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.1.1
>
>         Attachments: hbase-13709_v1.patch
>
>
> HBASE-11536 fixes a case where on a very rare occasion, the meta updates may 
> be processed out of order. The fix is to use the RS's timestamp for the 
> server column in meta update, but that actually opens up a vulnerability for 
> clock skew (see the discussions in the jira). 
> For the region replicas case, we can reproduce a problem where the server 
> name field is eclipsed by the masters earlier update because the RS is 
> lagging behind. However, this is not specific to replicas, but occurs more 
> frequently with it. 
> One option that was discussed was to send the master's ts with open region 
> RPC and use it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to