[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14561658#comment-14561658
 ] 

Apekshit Sharma commented on HBASE-13702:
-----------------------------------------

You're right, it would have been bad if these logs weren't available for 
back-reference later in time or if data was lost, but afai understand, the logs 
generated by mapper tasks are stored in stderr/stdout files locally so these 
should be no issue of data loss, and these logs are later available for 
back-reference from job history server.
http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2010/11/hadoop-log-location-and-retention/
http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2009/09/apache-hadoop-log-files-where-to-find-them-in-cdh-and-what-info-they-contain/

> ImportTsv: Add dry-run functionality and log bad rows
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13702
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Apekshit Sharma
>            Assignee: Apekshit Sharma
>         Attachments: HBASE-13702.patch
>
>
> ImportTSV job skips bad records by default (keeps a count though). 
> -Dimporttsv.skip.bad.lines=false can be used to fail if a bad row is 
> encountered. 
> To be easily able to determine which rows are corrupted in an input, rather 
> than failing on one row at a time seems like a good feature to have.
> Moreover, there should be 'dry-run' functionality in such kinds of tools, 
> which can essentially does a quick run of tool without making any changes but 
> reporting any errors/warnings and success/failure.
> To identify corrupted rows, simply logging them should be enough. In worst 
> case, all rows will be logged and size of logs will be same as input size, 
> which seems fine. However, user might have to do some work figuring out where 
> the logs. Is there some link we can show to the user when the tool starts 
> which can help them with that?
> For the dry run, we can simply use if-else to skip over writing out KVs, and 
> any other mutations, if present.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to