[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14572051#comment-14572051
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-13811:
-----------------------------------
If we flush all data in memstore, then use the flushid is reasonable? The
flushedSeqId is calculated at the preparing stage of a flush, and actually
assigned to region.maxFlushedSeqId after we successfully commit the flush. We
will not report it to master before the actual assign happen, so I think it is
safe?
> Splitting WALs, we are filtering out too many edits -> DATALOSS
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13811
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wal
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.2.0
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: 13811.branch-1.txt, 13811.branch-1.txt, 13811.txt,
> HBASE-13811-v1.testcase.patch, HBASE-13811.testcase.patch
>
>
> I've been running ITBLLs against branch-1 around HBASE-13616 (move of
> ServerShutdownHandler to pv2). I have come across an instance of dataloss. My
> patch for HBASE-13616 was in place so can only think it the cause (but cannot
> see how). When we split the logs, we are skipping legit edits. Digging.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
