[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14575109#comment-14575109
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13811:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12738020/13811.v8.branch-1.txt
  against branch-1 branch at commit 67c463f63e3c48efd9e1281166b707a3a806a2ad.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12738020

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 16 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn compile goal to 
fail with Hadoop version 2.4.1.

    Compilation errors resume:
    [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 
[ERROR] 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/wal/DisabledWALProvider.java:[85,17]
 error: DisabledWAL is not abstract and does not override abstract method 
startCacheFlush(byte[],Set<byte[]>) in WAL
[ERROR] 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/wal/DisabledWALProvider.java:[190,19]
 error: startCacheFlush(byte[],Set<byte[]>) in DisabledWAL cannot implement 
startCacheFlush(byte[],Set<byte[]>) in WAL
[ERROR]   return type boolean is not compatible with Long
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) 
on project hbase-server: Compilation failure: Compilation failure:
[ERROR] 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/wal/DisabledWALProvider.java:[85,17]
 error: DisabledWAL is not abstract and does not override abstract method 
startCacheFlush(byte[],Set<byte[]>) in WAL
[ERROR] 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/wal/DisabledWALProvider.java:[190,19]
 error: startCacheFlush(byte[],Set<byte[]>) in DisabledWAL cannot implement 
startCacheFlush(byte[],Set<byte[]>) in WAL
[ERROR] return type boolean is not compatible with Long
[ERROR] 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/wal/DisabledWALProvider.java:[189,4]
 error: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e 
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please 
read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR]   mvn <goals> -rf :hbase-server
    

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14308//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Splitting WALs, we are filtering out too many edits -> DATALOSS
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13811
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wal
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 13811.branch-1.txt, 13811.branch-1.txt, 13811.txt, 
> 13811.v2.branch-1.txt, 13811.v3.branch-1.txt, 13811.v3.branch-1.txt, 
> 13811.v4.branch-1.txt, 13811.v5.branch-1.txt, 13811.v6.branch-1.txt, 
> 13811.v6.branch-1.txt, 13811.v7.branch-1.txt, 13811.v8.branch-1.txt, 
> HBASE-13811-v1.testcase.patch, HBASE-13811.testcase.patch, 
> startCacheFlush.diff
>
>
> I've been running ITBLLs against branch-1 around HBASE-13616 (move of 
> ServerShutdownHandler to pv2). I have come across an instance of dataloss. My 
> patch for HBASE-13616 was in place so can only think it the cause (but cannot 
> see how). When we split the logs, we are skipping legit edits. Digging.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to