[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14580046#comment-14580046
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-13877:
---------------------------------------

bq.  He added nice tests over in HBASE-13811 so we don't regress. Any chance of 
our adding one here given it is torturous to figure
We can cook up something I guess. Not sure how to test the condition that 
HRegion.flush() should not be aborted, or it if throws DroppedSnapshotException 
will be properly handled. Do you have anything in mind? 
bq. though as said above, the "Enis the Detective" novel above was a good read
Hehe. That is the next title of my book. 


> Interrupt to flush from TableFlushProcedure causes dataloss in ITBLL
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13877
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0, 1.1.1
>
>         Attachments: hbase-13877_v1.patch, hbase-13877_v2-branch-1.1.patch
>
>
> ITBLL with 1.25B rows failed for me (and Stack as reported in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811?focusedCommentId=14577834&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14577834)
>  
> HBASE-13811 and HBASE-13853 fixed an issue with WAL edit filtering. 
> The root cause this time seems to be different. It is due to procedure based 
> flush interrupting the flush request in case the procedure is cancelled from 
> an exception elsewhere. This leaves the memstore snapshot intact without 
> aborting the server. The next flush, then flushes the previous memstore with 
> the current seqId (as opposed to seqId from the memstore snapshot). This 
> creates an hfile with larger seqId than what its contents are. Previous 
> behavior in 0.98 and 1.0 (I believe) is that after flush prepare and 
> interruption / exception will cause RS abort.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to