[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14581482#comment-14581482
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-13344:
----------------------------------------
I agree with the premise of this change but want to point out it's a liability
for 0.98, for as long as we're maintaining 0.98. See item #3 in the description
on HBASE-13887. 6u45 is long EOL so when and if there's another issue like this
without a workaround our options will be limited (probably - reverting this on
the branch so we can build with JDK 1.7).
> Add enforcer rule that matches our JDK support statement
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13344
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Matt Warhaftig
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: beginner, maven
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.94.28, 0.98.13, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.1.1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-13344-master.patch,
> HBASE-13344-master_addendum_v1.patch, HBASE-13344-master_v2.patch
>
>
> The [ref guide gives a list of JDKs that we expect our hbase versions to work
> with at runtime|http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#basic.prerequisites].
> Let's add in the extra-enforcer-rules mojo and start using [the bytecode
> version
> rule|http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/enforceBytecodeVersion.html]
> to make sure that the result of our builds on a given branch won't fail out
> because of a misconfigured target jdk version (or a dependency that targets a
> later jdk).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
