[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14587403#comment-14587403
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-12988:
---------------------------------------
Thanks [~apurtell]!
There's also another idea I had in the meanwhile: The sink logic I had
implemented to deal with cluster ids to avoid replication cycles already groups
by table and list<clusterid> and then applies this in batches. Could just do
the same logic on the sink (with the addition of also grouping by row), maybe
it's OK - performance wise - to break up the WALEdits and to reassemble them.
That would certainly make it easier later to stream per row edits to sinks.
> [Replication]Parallel apply edits on row-level
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12988
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12988
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Replication
> Reporter: hongyu bi
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Attachments: 12988.txt, HBASE-12988-0.98.patch,
> ParallelReplication-v2.txt
>
>
> we can apply edits to slave cluster in parallel on table-level to speed up
> replication .
> update : per conversation blow , it's better to apply edits on row-level in
> parallel
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
