[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14608362#comment-14608362
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12865:
-----------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12742805/HBASE-12865-V1.diff
  against master branch at commit f8bd578b80b4e656d799c82ca1b6191e35bb0ae4.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12742805

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 6 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14616//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14616//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14616//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14616//console

This message is automatically generated.

> WALs may be deleted before they are replicated to peers
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12865
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12865
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Replication
>            Reporter: Liu Shaohui
>            Assignee: He Liangliang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HBASE-12865-V1.diff
>
>
> By design, ReplicationLogCleaner guarantee that the WALs  being in 
> replication queue can't been deleted by the HMaster. The 
> ReplicationLogCleaner gets the WAL set from zookeeper by scanning the 
> replication zk node. But it may get uncompleted WAL set during replication 
> failover for the scan operation is not atomic.
> For example: There are three region servers: rs1, rs2, rs3, and peer id 10.  
> The layout of replication zookeeper nodes is:
> {code}
> /hbase/replication/rs/rs1/10/wals
>                      /rs2/10/wals
>                      /rs3/10/wals
> {code}
> - t1: the ReplicationLogCleaner finished scanning the replication queue of 
> rs1, and start to scan the queue of rs2.
> - t2: region server rs3 is down, and rs1 take over rs3's replication queue. 
> The new layout is
> {code}
> /hbase/replication/rs/rs1/10/wals
>                      /rs1/10-rs3/wals
>                      /rs2/10/wals
>                      /rs3
> {code}
> - t3, the ReplicationLogCleaner finished scanning the queue of rs2, and start 
> to scan the node of rs3. But the the queue has been moved to  
> "replication/rs1/10-rs3/WALS"
> So the  ReplicationLogCleaner will miss the WALs of rs3 in peer 10 and the 
> hmaster may delete these WALs before they are replicated to peer clusters.
> We encountered this problem in our cluster and I think it's a serious bug for 
> replication.
> Suggestions are welcomed to fix this bug. thx~



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to